Feedrabbit vs emit
Feedrabbit is an RSS-to-email service for readers — it delivers feeds to your own inbox. emit is the opposite: it lets you send your feed to your subscribers from your domain, with billing, suppression, and an API.
| emit | Feedrabbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Pay per email ($0.80/1k) | ~$25/year (reader) |
| Pay for inactive subscribers | No | N/A (personal) |
| RSS feed → newsletter (native) | Yes | To your own inbox |
| API-first / OpenAPI | Yes | No |
| Send from your own domain | Yes (SES, DKIM) | No |
| Paid subscriptions / paywall | No | No |
| Best for | Devs & their agents | Reading feeds in email |
As of 2026, Feedrabbit is ~$25/year and delivers feeds to your own inbox. Verify current plans on their site. Last reviewed May 2026.
Why developers pick emit over Feedrabbit
- You want to publish to a subscriber list, not just read feeds yourself.
- Double opt-in, bounce/complaint handling, unsubscribe, and analytics.
- Send from your domain with an API and embeddable signup forms.
When Feedrabbit is the better choice
Feedrabbit is the better choice if you personally want to read blogs/feeds in your inbox — it's a reader tool, not a sending platform.
emit pricing
$0.80 per 1,000 emails, prepaid — no subscriber tiers, no monthly minimum, no revenue cut. See pricing, the full comparison, or add a subscribe form.